|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:06:41 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 6:06 pm
Subject: Re: Wikipedia contradiction in re: hyperbolic geometry; and in general, the geometries
mstem...@walkabout.empros.com (Michael Stemper) writes: Nonsensical? How could it be? This discovery is just another in a > In article <c28bde2b-e7b7-413f-95bb-2ed64559f...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Ken Quirici <kquir...@yahoo.com> writes: >>First, Wikipedia's article on non-euclidean geometry contradicts the >>article on hyperbolic geometry in that the former says that, in a >>hyperbolic geometry, given a >>BTW I can find no way to make sense of the notion of > That notion does seem nonsensical. Where did it come from? long line of breakthroughs by the King of Science, Archimedes Plutonium. I bet you're embarrassed now. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||