Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion WHY EINSTEIN STILL RULES
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Peter Webb  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5 2009, 10:03 am
Newsgroups: sci.logic, alt.philosophy, sci.astro, sci.math
From: "Peter Webb" <webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:03:10 +1100
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 10:03 am
Subject: Re: WHY EINSTEIN STILL RULES

"Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:72a2eb8a-8d93-4cde-8a3e-43adc739b632@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

> In Einsteiniana:

> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327246.800-13-more-things-mag...
> "In 2005, researchers at the MAGIC gamma-ray telescope on La Palma in
> the Canary Islands were studying gamma-ray bursts emitted by the black
> hole in the centre of the Markarian 501 galaxy, half a billion light
> years away. The burst's high-energy gamma rays arrived at the
> telescope 4 minutes later than the lower-energy rays. Both parts of
> the spectrum should have been emitted at the same time. So is the time
> lag due to the high-energy radiation travelling slower through space?
> That wouldn't make sense: it would contravene one of the central
> tenets of special relativity. According to Einstein, all
> electromagnetic radiation always travels through vacuum at the cosmic
> speed limit the speed of light. The energy of the radiation should be
> absolutely irrelevant."

What a crock of shit, and from New Scientist!

The space between here and a galaxy 500 million light years away is not a
complete vacuum, in fact accumulated over 500 million light years each
photon passes a *lot* of matter.

Light does go slower when not going through a vacuum, that's how lenses
work. Its called diffraction. And this is frequency dependent, which is why
cheap lenses have rainbow effects, this also has been known for centuries.
And longer wavelengths are almost always affected more.

I bet even the short wavelengths were beaten to earth by the Neutrino flux,
which actually outruns light in even the thinnest vacuums.

I expect the next paragraph of the New Scientist went on to explain this,
and you just snipped it.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google