Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Towards avoiding paradoxes with set theory: Corrected.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Charlie-Boo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2009, 5:15 am
Newsgroups: sci.logic, sci.math
From: Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:15:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 5:15 am
Subject: Re: Towards avoiding paradoxes with set theory: Corrected.
On Nov 2, 9:35 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 2, 3:23 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:

> > All this time, I've thought you're just a silly, self-aggrandizing
> > nincompoop.  I had no idea that you were also a disgusting son of a
> > bitch.

> Well put.

> Marshall

Shared Psychotic Disorder.  Interesting.

http://www.minddisorders.com/Py-Z/Shared-psychotic-disorder.html

Definition

Shared psychotic disorder, a rare and atypical psychotic disorder,
occurs when an otherwise healthy person (secondary partner) begins
believing the delusions of someone with whom they have a close
relationship (primary partner)

EXAMPLE: PROFESSOR/PUPIL

who is already suffering from a psychotic disorder with prominent
delusions. This disorder is also referred to as "folie á deux."

Description

In cases of shared psychotic disorder, the primary partner is most
often in a position of strong influence over the other person.

TEACHER OVER STUDENT

This allows them, over time, to erode the defenses of the secondary
partner, forcing their strange belief upon them.

STRANGE BELIEF: A SYSTEM FORMALLY GENERATES THEOREMS BUT THERE ARE NO
EXAMPLES OF ANY THEOREMS THAT IT GENERATES

In the beginning, the secondary partner is probably healthy, but has
such a passive or dependent relationship with the primary partner

STUDENT HAS TO LEARN WHAT THE PROFESSOR TEACHES

that imposition of the delusional system is but a matter of time. Most
of the time, this disorder occurs in a nuclear family. In fact, more
than 95% of the cases reported involved people in the same family.

ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAME UNIVERSITY

Without regard to the number of persons within the family, shared
delusions generally involve two people. There is the primary, most
often the dominant person,

PROFESSOR

and the secondary or submissive person

STUDENT

. This becomes fertile ground for the primary (dominant) partner to
press for understanding and belief by others in the family.

EXAMPLE: A DISPLAY OF A PRINTOUT OF THEOREMS FROM A COMPUTER PROGRAM
HAS TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS

Shared psychotic disorder has also been referred to by other names
such as psychosis of association, contagious insanity, infectious
insanity, double insanity, and communicated insanity.

NOTICE THAT ALL CONTAIN THE WORD "INSANITY"

There have been cases involving multiple persons, the most significant
being a case involving an entire family of 12 people (folie á douze).

Read more: http://www.minddisorders.com/Py-Z/Shared-psychotic-disorder.html#ixzz...

C-B


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google