Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion GR -> Schwarzschild Metric -> Black Holes
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Juan R. González-Álvarez  
View profile  
 More options Nov 2 2009, 8:54 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREM...@canonicalscience.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:54:29 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 8:54 am
Subject: Re: GR -> Schwarzschild Metric -> Black Holes
"Juan R." González-Álvarez wrote on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:17:16 +0000:

> Tom Roberts wrote on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:24:33 -0500:

>> Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote:
>>> Second the 'field' equations of GR are not really field equations, not
>>> even when written in relaxed form!

>> This is just plain not true, regardless of whatever you mean by
>> "relaxed form". The field equation of GR relates fields, making it a
>> field equation.

> I do not like to debate stuff with ignorants as you, who lack even the
> most elementary knowledge of the topics.

> At least you could show some interest in your education Tom and search
> *standard* concepts as "relaxed form" before posting

> http://www.emis.de/journals/LRG/Articles/lrr-2006-3/articlesu14.html

Link is not working today. Tom, I doubt that you can see that "lrr-2006-3"
is a typical code of living reviews journal, knowing your ignorance
of literature :-D

For the benefit of your education Tom, I add another link to the
"relaxed form" of Einstein equations (see eq 62)

http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2006-3&page=ar...

But calling them field equations is still wrong. Explaining why is advanced and
requires a good basis of both GR and field theory.

There is an entire section (section 14) in

http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencere...

discussing the differences between the Hilbert-Einstein equations in relaxed
form [equation 62 in above link, equation 15 in the CSR:20092 report] and
the equations of field theory of gravity [equation 41 in the CSR:20092 report]

I will leave this part of your education for another day. Now just start above
Tom; familiarizate yourself with the basic stuff FIRST.

(...)

--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/

BLOG:
http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalscienceto...


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google