FLT - The True Nature of this Problem Revealed - sci.math

Message from discussion FLT - The True Nature of this Problem Revealed

master1729

View profile

More options Nov 3 2009, 11:10 pm

Newsgroups: sci.math

From: master1729 <tommy1...@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:10:03 EST

Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 11:10 pm

Subject: Re: FLT - The True Nature of this Problem Revealed

  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

Phil Jackson wrote :

> This paper has been shown to several mathematicians
> including a highly respected researcher. They have
> not been able to break this proof but they still
> don't want to accept it, for reasons that are nothing
> to do with the logic.

> I believe that the simple logic cannot be faulted but
> want to test that against a wider audience.

> I'm not an academic and some of the terminology may
> be used in a context that is in conflict with its
> traditional usage but it should be simple enough for
> anyone to quickly grasp.

not even close to a proof.

jsh did better !

im trying to find a short proof myself.

i once tried to prove a short proof doest exist.

but failed and at the moment try to find a short proof myself.

also because i once tried to prove a short proof of RH doesnt exist.

and now i now it actually does exist. ( " relatively short " not as short as your doc of course :p lol sorry )

that drives me back to FLT.

but FLT is one though son of a bitch...

anyways , its clear you need to practice your number theory skills.

regards

tommy1729

Forward