Newsgroups: sci.math
From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:07:15 +0100
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 11:07 am
Subject: Re: Two fatal defects of Wiles' proof of FLT
Edgar E. Escultura <escultu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
1117368396.14753.1257416680869.JavaMail.r...@gallium.mathforum.org > Two Fatal Defects of Andrew Wiles’ Proof of FLT On Usenet he can write whatever he wants about his current > By E. E. Escultura > 1) The field axioms of the real number system are inconsistent; Felix Brouwer and this blogger provided counterexamples to the > 2) The other fatal defect is that the complex number system that Wiles used in the proof being based on the vacuous concept i is > i = sqrt(1/-1) = sqrt 1/sqrt(-1) = 1/i = i/i^2 = -i or > 1 = -1 (division of both sides by i), > 2 = 0, 1 = 0, i = 0, and, for any real number x, x = 0, > and the entire real and complex number systems collapse. The remedy is in the appendix to the paper, The generalized integral as > Another example of a vacuous concept is the greatest integer. Let N be the greatest integer. By the trichotomy axiom one and only > E. E. Escultura title, but it looks like the institute forced him to include the Emeritus qualifier on his website :-) Yes, people like this are allowed on the street. Dirk Vdm You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||