|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
From: PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:00:22 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 6:00 pm
Subject: Re: Principle of Relativity
On Oct 28, 6:49 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can state the principle of relativity in any word salad you want. OK, but that doesn't have anything to do with the principle of > However, the definitive mathematical requirement is very simple and > elegant. Consider two points, Point #1 and Point #2, observing each > other. It does not involve another point (say Point #0). > ** [v_12] + [v_21] = 0 relativity, nor does it serve as an alternative definition of the principle of relativity. > Where > ** [v_12] = Velocity vector of Point #2 as observed by Point #1 > Let’s look at the Galilean transform for velocity involving Point #0, > ** [v_12] = [v_02] – [v_01] > Where > ** [v_01] = Velocity of Point #1 as observed by Point #0 > Thus, Point #0 can be any point to satisfy the result of the very > Does anyone have any objections? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||