Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion GR -> Schwarzschild Metric -> Black Holes
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
hanson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 2 2009, 5:00 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
From: "hanson" <han...@quick.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:00:31 -0800
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 5:00 am
Subject: Re: GR -> Schwarzschild Metric -> Black Holes

ahahahaha... AHAHAHA....For "mL" <mL.bey...@elsewhere.xxx>
Mel Lep, it was beyond belief when he read and wrote:

> hanson:

> > hanson wrote:

<http://tinyurl.com/yjlxhtd> --> Barycenter --- KW
<http://tinyurl.com/yjbpwrh> -- <|||| d^2(1/rho)/dt^2 -> G ||||
> > Raemsch, if you wish to sell your weltbild about the issue then
> > produce some math about it. Start with |||| d^2(1/rho)/dt^2 -> G ||||
> > This says ~ that the spatial acceleration, (dt^2) of expansion or
> > contraction, of matter content in normal 3D space , expressed
> > here as reciprocal density, 1/rho, will asymptotically default to
> > the numerical value of Newton's G... producing our regular physics
> > phenomena as we know them.

1st clumsy fishing attempt by Mel Lep, the schlep, who wrote:
> Funny fantasies, but please continue.

hanson wrote:
> > Show examples of this along the way and you'll  demonstrate
> > mathematically that there is no matter content within a the
> > confines of a so-called black hole. To connect this to the bary-
> > center of the particles/bodies that make up this spatial domain
> > is the next step. Show the math. Don't lament.... ahahahanson

2nd attempt by schLep, who wrote:
> Why don't you do the derivation yourself?  Are you
> so scared of math that you ask characters like KW
> and Raemsch for help?

hanson wrote:

ahahahaha... You committed a Freudian Slip here, schLep!
ahahaha... Do it instead of asking the gauche way, like you
just did. You obviously do not even understand the concept
schLep, so why should I  throw my pearls before the swine that
your are?...  Try harder, schLep. Till then thanks for the laughs...
ahahahanson

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google