<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math</link>
  <description>Mathematical discussions and pursuits.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Do you believe in Physics ?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/3e47f9507f1f0045/984f7045729fde9f?show_docid=984f7045729fde9f</link>
  <description>
  Do you believe in Physics ? &lt;br&gt; You don’t have to be so sure. Why ? &lt;br&gt; === . &lt;br&gt; How does Physics look now? &lt;br&gt; The basis of the Physics consists of: &lt;br&gt; 1. &lt;br&gt; Abstract ‘ inertial movement’. &lt;br&gt; 2. &lt;br&gt; Abstract ‘ideal gas and ideal particles.’ &lt;br&gt; 3. &lt;br&gt; Abstract ‘absolute black body.’ &lt;br&gt; 4. &lt;br&gt; Abstract ‘entropy’ &lt;br&gt; 5. &lt;br&gt; Abstract SRT negative 4 - D space,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/3e47f9507f1f0045/984f7045729fde9f?show_docid=984f7045729fde9f</guid>
  <author>
  isra...@yahoo.com
  (socratus)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:21:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/a1e583b3e6cb8d6a?show_docid=a1e583b3e6cb8d6a</link>
  <description>
  On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:14:10 -0800 (PST), Joseki &amp;lt;jabriol2...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote in alt.talk.creationism: &lt;br&gt; There is no reason to believe such a claim. Those who make claims about &lt;br&gt; gods have managed to invent impossible gods.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/a1e583b3e6cb8d6a?show_docid=a1e583b3e6cb8d6a</guid>
  <author>
  lu...@nofreelunch.us
  (Free Lunch)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:40:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/ee21dd9840846803?show_docid=ee21dd9840846803</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Do you believe you might be face to face with God?&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; I see you won&#39;t answer my question. &lt;br&gt; I will answer yours. No, I don&#39;t see how I can come &amp;quot;face to face&amp;quot; with a &lt;br&gt; figment of someone else&#39;s imagination, do you?. &lt;br&gt; I repeat my question. Do you believe that abiogenists can never be &lt;br&gt; reproduced in a lab?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/ee21dd9840846803?show_docid=ee21dd9840846803</guid>
  <author>
  d...@listermann.com
  (Dan Listermann)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:27:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/10ccba757b072391?show_docid=10ccba757b072391</link>
  <description>
  Do you believe you might be face to face with God?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/10ccba757b072391?show_docid=10ccba757b072391</guid>
  <author>
  jabriol2...@gmail.com
  (Joseki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:14:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/5d939f16fb878fea?show_docid=5d939f16fb878fea</link>
  <description>
  You mean one flies and the other doesn&#39;t?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8e21cd84fe4efc3c/5d939f16fb878fea?show_docid=5d939f16fb878fea</guid>
  <author>
  jabriol2...@gmail.com
  (Joseki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:12:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: serie 1/(a^k-1)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/9b62e02ae9f7a49a/67591b900e4b15de?show_docid=67591b900e4b15de</link>
  <description>
  Am 20.11.2009 21:51 schrieb ksoileau: &lt;br&gt; 1/(a^1 -1) = 1/a + 1/a^2 + 1/a^3 + 1/a^4 + ... &lt;br&gt; 1/(a^2 -1) = 1/a^2 + 1/a^4 + 1/a^6 + 1/a^8 + ... &lt;br&gt; 1/(a^3 -1) = 1/a^3 + 1/a^6 + 1/a^9 + 1/a^12 +... &lt;br&gt; 1/(a^4 -1) = 1/a^4 + 1/a^8 + 1/a^12 +1/a^16 + ... &lt;br&gt; ... = .... &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ------------------------
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/9b62e02ae9f7a49a/67591b900e4b15de?show_docid=67591b900e4b15de</guid>
  <author>
  he...@uni-kassel.de
  (Gottfried Helms)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:12:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Trouble finding a PhD program.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2af8c243ae8e2240/0cf9f0f1554541b3?show_docid=0cf9f0f1554541b3</link>
  <description>
  Teachers surely facilitate that process. &lt;br&gt; Teaching yourself how to play is a much more difficult approach than &lt;br&gt; having a teacher. Both processes require work, but it&#39;s a lot easier &lt;br&gt; to learn from someone more skilled than yourself than to try to teach &lt;br&gt; yourself from scratch. &lt;br&gt; The same goes with mathematics and other disciplines. In principle,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2af8c243ae8e2240/0cf9f0f1554541b3?show_docid=0cf9f0f1554541b3</guid>
  <author>
  je...@phiwumbda.org
  (Jesse F. Hughes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:59:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Physical Set Theory</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a6f510da01c33a8b/d95945b6cb74a784?show_docid=d95945b6cb74a784</link>
  <description>
  Although this version of this theory is an extreme finitisim, but yet &lt;br&gt; wouldn&#39;t it be complete,consistent, and Categorical? &lt;br&gt; Would it escape Godel&#39;s incompleteness theorems 1 and 2. &lt;br&gt; Zuhair
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a6f510da01c33a8b/d95945b6cb74a784?show_docid=d95945b6cb74a784</guid>
  <author>
  zaljo...@gmail.com
  (zuhair)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:57:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Trouble finding a PhD program.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2af8c243ae8e2240/bab8687cd4aec009?show_docid=bab8687cd4aec009</link>
  <description>
  Yes, this *is* a mighty entertaining rant, and very plausible too! &lt;br&gt; But rather distracting in a thread aimed at answering one person&#39;s &lt;br&gt; question about a PhD program. Do you suppose that the OP really gives &lt;br&gt; a shit about your opinion regarding the worth of academic degrees?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2af8c243ae8e2240/bab8687cd4aec009?show_docid=bab8687cd4aec009</guid>
  <author>
  je...@phiwumbda.org
  (Jesse F. Hughes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:54:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Is ZF + CH + not-CC consistent?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/116db874ffb6b032/fbbb05a8a57cd0aa?show_docid=fbbb05a8a57cd0aa</link>
  <description>
  In message &amp;lt;he58t1$6o...@theodyn.ncf.ca&amp;gt;, David Libert &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;ah...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA&amp;gt; writes &lt;br&gt; I threw that one in as a way of getting trichotomy for all cardinals not &lt;br&gt; larger than c, which Herman had mentioned (though perhaps he really &lt;br&gt; meant &#39;smaller than or equal to c&#39;). I too don&#39;t know anything about how
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/116db874ffb6b032/fbbb05a8a57cd0aa?show_docid=fbbb05a8a57cd0aa</guid>
  <author>
  m...@privacy.net
  (David Hartley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:30:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: serie 1/(a^k-1)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/9b62e02ae9f7a49a/53bc5b6685692264?show_docid=53bc5b6685692264</link>
  <description>
  For large a, a good approximation is 1+1/a-ln(a-1)/ln(a)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/9b62e02ae9f7a49a/53bc5b6685692264?show_docid=53bc5b6685692264</guid>
  <author>
  kmsoil...@gmail.com
  (ksoileau)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:51:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/339439b3a3557c0f/e3dd64a35c415fda?show_docid=e3dd64a35c415fda</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;pan.2009.11.20.17.35...@right here.net&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Perhaps it is because you are by nature dippy and it is merely like &lt;br&gt; drawn to like. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;That only speaks to your own limitations. Others may well draw insights &lt;br&gt; from what is meaningless to you.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/339439b3a3557c0f/e3dd64a35c415fda?show_docid=e3dd64a35c415fda</guid>
  <author>
  vir...@home.esc
  (Virgil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:41:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/339439b3a3557c0f/bfe99c4711321685?show_docid=bfe99c4711321685</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;pan.2009.11.20.16.25...@right here.net&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Are the consequences of espousing that Platonic ideal any worse than &lt;br&gt; those of espousing, say, creationism. I very much doubt it. &lt;br&gt; If the worst that mathematics engenders is such espousal, it is in &lt;br&gt; better shape than the rest of the world.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/339439b3a3557c0f/bfe99c4711321685?show_docid=bfe99c4711321685</guid>
  <author>
  vir...@home.esc
  (Virgil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:37:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Trouble finding a PhD program.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2af8c243ae8e2240/9aa0429bdde4b03f?show_docid=9aa0429bdde4b03f</link>
  <description>
  Scholarships are to cover tuition and living expenses, such as rent &lt;br&gt; and food. You do actually need food, and probably a place to live, in &lt;br&gt; order to do mathematics. &lt;br&gt; At public universities these scholarships, even for graduate students &lt;br&gt; in mathematics, are often low enough that the students must also get
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2af8c243ae8e2240/9aa0429bdde4b03f?show_docid=9aa0429bdde4b03f</guid>
  <author>
  anonymous.rubbert...@yahoo.com
  (A)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:35:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/339439b3a3557c0f/56619124943ad456?show_docid=56619124943ad456</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;pan.2009.11.20.16.17...@right here.net&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; De gustibus non est disputandum. &lt;br&gt; There are those here who find you boring (not to mention impractical).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/339439b3a3557c0f/56619124943ad456?show_docid=56619124943ad456</guid>
  <author>
  vir...@home.esc
  (Virgil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:32:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
