sci.math Google Group

Do you believe in Physics ?

2009-11-20T23:21:41Z

Do you believe in Physics ?
You don’t have to be so sure. Why ?
=== .
How does Physics look now?
The basis of the Physics consists of:
1.
Abstract ‘ inertial movement’.
2.
Abstract ‘ideal gas and ideal particles.’
3.
Abstract ‘absolute black body.’
4.
Abstract ‘entropy’
5.
Abstract SRT negative 4 - D space,

Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?

2009-11-20T22:40:27Z

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:14:10 -0800 (PST), Joseki <jabriol2...@gmail.com>
wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
There is no reason to believe such a claim. Those who make claims about
gods have managed to invent impossible gods.

Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?

2009-11-20T22:27:30Z

"Do you believe you might be face to face with God?"
I see you won't answer my question.
I will answer yours. No, I don't see how I can come "face to face" with a
figment of someone else's imagination, do you?.
I repeat my question. Do you believe that abiogenists can never be
reproduced in a lab?

Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?

2009-11-20T22:14:10Z

Do you believe you might be face to face with God?

Re: The Bible And Evolution..compatible?

2009-11-20T22:12:29Z

You mean one flies and the other doesn't?

Re: serie 1/(a^k-1)

2009-11-20T22:12:16Z

Am 20.11.2009 21:51 schrieb ksoileau:
1/(a^1 -1) = 1/a + 1/a^2 + 1/a^3 + 1/a^4 + ...
1/(a^2 -1) = 1/a^2 + 1/a^4 + 1/a^6 + 1/a^8 + ...
1/(a^3 -1) = 1/a^3 + 1/a^6 + 1/a^9 + 1/a^12 +...
1/(a^4 -1) = 1/a^4 + 1/a^8 + 1/a^12 +1/a^16 + ...
... = ....
------------------------------ ------------------------

Re: Trouble finding a PhD program.

2009-11-20T20:59:24Z

Teachers surely facilitate that process.
Teaching yourself how to play is a much more difficult approach than
having a teacher. Both processes require work, but it's a lot easier
to learn from someone more skilled than yourself than to try to teach
yourself from scratch.
The same goes with mathematics and other disciplines. In principle,

Re: Physical Set Theory

2009-11-20T20:57:15Z

Although this version of this theory is an extreme finitisim, but yet
wouldn't it be complete,consistent, and Categorical?
Would it escape Godel's incompleteness theorems 1 and 2.
Zuhair

Re: Trouble finding a PhD program.

2009-11-20T20:54:44Z

Yes, this *is* a mighty entertaining rant, and very plausible too!
But rather distracting in a thread aimed at answering one person's
question about a PhD program. Do you suppose that the OP really gives
a shit about your opinion regarding the worth of academic degrees?

Re: Is ZF + CH + not-CC consistent?

2009-11-20T20:30:29Z

In message <he58t1$6o...@theodyn.ncf.ca>, David Libert
<ah...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> writes
I threw that one in as a way of getting trichotomy for all cardinals not
larger than c, which Herman had mentioned (though perhaps he really
meant 'smaller than or equal to c'). I too don't know anything about how

Re: serie 1/(a^k-1)

2009-11-20T20:51:47Z

For large a, a good approximation is 1+1/a-ln(a-1)/ln(a)

Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics

2009-11-20T20:41:53Z

In article <pan.2009.11.20.17.35...@right here.net>,
Perhaps it is because you are by nature dippy and it is merely like
drawn to like.

That only speaks to your own limitations. Others may well draw insights
from what is meaningless to you.

Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics

2009-11-20T20:37:37Z

In article <pan.2009.11.20.16.25...@right here.net>,
Are the consequences of espousing that Platonic ideal any worse than
those of espousing, say, creationism. I very much doubt it.
If the worst that mathematics engenders is such espousal, it is in
better shape than the rest of the world.

Re: Trouble finding a PhD program.

2009-11-20T20:35:03Z

Scholarships are to cover tuition and living expenses, such as rent
and food. You do actually need food, and probably a place to live, in
order to do mathematics.
At public universities these scholarships, even for graduate students
in mathematics, are often low enough that the students must also get

Re: The Impotence Of Mathematics

2009-11-20T20:32:46Z

In article <pan.2009.11.20.16.17...@right here.net>,
De gustibus non est disputandum.
There are those here who find you boring (not to mention impractical).