> > On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

> > > On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:

> > > > Pressure accrues.
> > > > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.

> > > > What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ”
> > > > at the center of the earth ?

> > > At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has
> > > tightened on you to terrific pressure.  Only difference is that the
> > > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your
> > > brains to squirt out!

> > > Double-A

> > However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as
> > representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%)
> > whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even
> > reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final
> > sphere), how can there be pressure?

> >  ~ BG

> If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would
> you care about gravity?  Get the point?

> Double-A

> > On Nov 3, 10:52 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

> > > > On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:

> > > > > Pressure accrues.
> > > > > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.

> > > > > What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ”
> > > > > at the center of the earth ?

> > > > At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has
> > > > tightened on you to terrific pressure.  Only difference is that the
> > > > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your
> > > > brains to squirt out!

> > > > Double-A

> > > However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as
> > > representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%)
> > > whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even
> > > reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final
> > > sphere), how can there be pressure?

> > >  ~ BG

> > If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would
> > you care about gravity?  Get the point?

> > Double-A

> At near zero gravity, where's all that pressure coming from?

> How much does lead or any other element weigh at zero gravity?

>  ~ BG

> > On Nov 3, 11:57 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

> > > On Nov 3, 10:52 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

> > > > > On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:

> > > > > > Pressure accrues.
> > > > > > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.

> > > > > > What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ”
> > > > > > at the center of the earth ?

> > > > > At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has
> > > > > tightened on you to terrific pressure.  Only difference is that the
> > > > > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your
> > > > > brains to squirt out!

> > > > > Double-A

> > > > However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as
> > > > representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%)
> > > > whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even
> > > > reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final
> > > > sphere), how can there be pressure?

> > > >  ~ BG

> > > If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would
> > > you care about gravity?  Get the point?

> > > Double-A

> > At near zero gravity, where's all that pressure coming from?

> > How much does lead or any other element weigh at zero gravity?

> >  ~ BG

> The pressure is coming from the mass on all sides of you that IS
> feeling gravity and is all pushing inwards, each side attracting the
> opposite side.

> Double-A

> > "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:441e8ea2-89e4-4b3d-8091-50f193628723@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Oct 29, 7:10 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
> > >> Brad·Guth's “hollow earth” theory is insane. Pressure accrues.
> > >> Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana Trench.

> > >> The center of earth is like that but, instead of water,
> > >> you have zetta·tons of blazing·hot steel pressing down on you.

> > > It's just a theory, although hollow is relative.

> > Hollow is defined, not relative.

> > > How about a reduced pressure and/or lower density interior?

> > The pressure at the center is created through compression, not
> > gravitational attraction AT THE CORE, rather the matter trying to get
> > TO/THRU the core via the resultant vector created by ALL of the matter
> > of the earth, not just at the core.

> > However, do to this compression the matter at the core will have a
> > higher specific density, thus a bit more gravity than the same material
> > would have without a large mass trying to press through equally from
> > all sides.

> That’s really odd, because in deep underground caves or mine shafts,
> other than the expected atmospheric pressure increase that’s obvious
> and somewhat minor (<42% increase per 3.5 km depth unless you plan on
> artificially cooling that column of air in order to get a 100%
> increase per 3.5 km), there’s hardly any other significant geology
> pressures for our physiology to contend with, including while swimming
> or scuba diving in those deep underground lakes or aquifers, and
> there’s certainly not any big increase in gravity (if anything it only
> measurably increases ever so slightly), and there’s certainly no
> objective way of telling if the inner core is merely that of a dense
> shell that’s hollow inside, or not.
> http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/2506/1/IJRSP%2037(1)%2...

>> > On Nov 3, 11:57 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

>> > > On Nov 3, 10:52 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > > > On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

>> > > > > On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:

>> > > > > > Pressure accrues.
>> > > > > > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.

>> > > > > > What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ”
>> > > > > > at the center of the earth ?

>> > > > > At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has
>> > > > > tightened on you to terrific pressure.  Only difference is that the
>> > > > > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your
>> > > > > brains to squirt out!

>> > > > > Double-A

>> > > > However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as
>> > > > representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%)
>> > > > whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even
>> > > > reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final
>> > > > sphere), how can there be pressure?

>> > > >  ~ BG

>> > > If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would
>> > > you care about gravity?  Get the point?

>> > > Double-A

>> > At near zero gravity, where's all that pressure coming from?

>> > How much does lead or any other element weigh at zero gravity?

>> >  ~ BG

>> The pressure is coming from the mass on all sides of you that IS
>> feeling gravity and is all pushing inwards, each side attracting the
>> opposite side.

>> Double-A

>However, an eggshell would likely protect you, because the vast bulk
>of whatever is surrounding yourself is being pulled outwards unless
>you yourself represented more density than anything else (thus you'd
>be representing gravity).

>If the core substance were that of hydrogen and helium?

> ~ BG

>It could easily be hollow.

>>On Nov 3, 12:49 pm, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:
>>> On Nov 3, 12:36 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> > On Nov 3, 11:57 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

>>> > > On Nov 3, 10:52 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> > > > On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:

>>> > > > > On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:

>>> > > > > > Pressure accrues.
>>> > > > > > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.

>>> > > > > > What could produce " reduced pressure and/or lower density "
>>> > > > > > at the center of the earth ?

>>> > > > > At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has
>>> > > > > tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that
>>> > > > > the
>>> > > > > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for
>>> > > > > your
>>> > > > > brains to squirt out!

>>> > > > > Double-A

>>> > > > However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as
>>> > > > representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%)
>>> > > > whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or
>>> > > > even
>>> > > > reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this
>>> > > > final
>>> > > > sphere), how can there be pressure?

>>> > > > ~ BG

>>> > > If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would
>>> > > you care about gravity? Get the point?

>>> > > Double-A

>>> > At near zero gravity, where's all that pressure coming from?

>>> > How much does lead or any other element weigh at zero gravity?

>>> > ~ BG

>>> The pressure is coming from the mass on all sides of you that IS
>>> feeling gravity and is all pushing inwards, each side attracting the
>>> opposite side.

>>> Double-A

>>However, an eggshell would likely protect you, because the vast bulk
>>of whatever is surrounding yourself is being pulled outwards unless
>>you yourself represented more density than anything else (thus you'd
>>be representing gravity).

>>If the core substance were that of hydrogen and helium?

>> ~ BG

> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning
> neutron
> star?

> It could easily be hollow.

> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
> star?

> It could easily be hollow.

>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
>> star?

>> It could easily be hollow.

>   No Henry, Henri--the centrifugal force from the perspective
>   of a rotating coordinate system goes to zero at the core.

>>Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
>>gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
>>star?

>>It could easily be hollow.

>No, I'm pretty sure it couldn't.  It couldn't spin fast enough without
>tearing itself apart and it would cease to be a neutron star long before
>it got to that point.

>Alan

>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
>news:5sa1f5lm6ollp6vjmlva7p7mfjmiao1na6@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:11:56 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com>
>>>However, an eggshell would likely protect you, because the vast bulk
>>>of whatever is surrounding yourself is being pulled outwards unless
>>>you yourself represented more density than anything else (thus you'd
>>>be representing gravity).

>>>If the core substance were that of hydrogen and helium?

>>> ~ BG

>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning
>> neutron
>> star?

>> It could easily be hollow.

>Nobody thinks the Earth is hollow, and he doesn't read my posts.
>Nobody is drunk, the only thing that is hollow is his cask of cheap
>red wine.

>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

> news:8398584a-b8da-4e4c-b333-11f3b5350b25@o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 30, 12:30 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Oct 30, 9:07 am, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde...@dirtcheap.net> wrote:

> > > "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:441e8ea2-89e4-4b3d-8091-50f193628723@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Oct 29, 7:10 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
> > > >> Brad·Guth's “hollow earth” theory is insane. Pressure accrues.
> > > >> Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana Trench.

> > > >> The center of earth is like that but, instead of water,
> > > >> you have zetta·tons of blazing·hot steel pressing down on you.

> > > > It's just a theory, although hollow is relative.

> > > Hollow is defined, not relative.

> > > > How about a reduced pressure and/or lower density interior?

> > > The pressure at the center is created through compression, not
> > > gravitational attraction AT THE CORE, rather the matter trying to get
> > > TO/THRU the core via the resultant vector created by ALL of the matter
> > > of the earth, not just at the core.

> > > However, do to this compression the matter at the core will have a
> > > higher specific density, thus a bit more gravity than the same material
> > > would have without a large mass trying to press through equally from
> > > all sides.

> > That’s really odd, because in deep underground caves or mine shafts,
> > other than the expected atmospheric pressure increase that’s obvious
> > and somewhat minor (<42% increase per 3.5 km depth unless you plan on
> > artificially cooling that column of air in order to get a 100%
> > increase per 3.5 km), there’s hardly any other significant geology
> > pressures for our physiology to contend with, including while swimming
> > or scuba diving in those deep underground lakes or aquifers, and
> > there’s certainly not any big increase in gravity (if anything it only
> > measurably increases ever so slightly), and there’s certainly no
> > objective way of telling if the inner core is merely that of a dense
> > shell that’s hollow inside, or not.
> >http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/2506/1/IJRSP%2037(1)%2...

> The fact that gravity increases measurably in deep caves/mines tells
> you that the interior of the Earth is denser than the rock above you.
> Otherwise gravity would have already begun to decrease.

> Double-A

> My dearest Double-A!
> The centerline gravity Has begun to decrease.
> It's the downward semi-lateral crust density that increases a bit more
> quickly than that centerline decrease that causes the increase in net
> gravitational force as one goes deeper into the crust.
> For a time.

> Measuring devices used so far have no way of distinguishing the semi-lateral
> forces from the centerline force, so they measure the net force as having
> increased.
> There is, of course, a semi-lateral force at the surface which, if separated
> from the centerline force, would be found to be at minimum, and it increases
> quickly as spelunkers and divers explore to deeper levels.

> At a glance, it may seem that the semi-lateral forces cancel.
> That is only true if they are 180 degrees out of phase.
> There are infinite directions of pull that are less than 180 degrees out of
> phase.
> The downward semi-laterals do eventually get cancelled more and more by the
> upward forces.
> One must go extremely deep before the net decrease would begin to establish
> itself.

> What you call "gravity" must be the greatest fun for all of you!
> You must try to imagine the real vectorial forces upon you and shy away from
> Newton's centerline-only gravitational image.
> Such an imagication is quite limiting.

> The sky is a "limit", and it stretches out in infinite directions.
> So why not the ground also?
> Is the Earth not infinite vectorisations within a finite boundary?

> --
>                                                             Darla

>>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
>>news:5sa1f5lm6ollp6vjmlva7p7mfjmiao1na6@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:11:56 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com>

>>>>However, an eggshell would likely protect you, because the vast bulk
>>>>of whatever is surrounding yourself is being pulled outwards unless
>>>>you yourself represented more density than anything else (thus you'd
>>>>be representing gravity).

>>>>If the core substance were that of hydrogen and helium?

>>>> ~ BG

>>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
>>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning
>>> neutron
>>> star?

>>> It could easily be hollow.

>>Nobody thinks the Earth is hollow, and he doesn't read my posts.
>>Nobody is drunk, the only thing that is hollow is his cask of cheap
>>red wine.

> I suppose you will now include "Wilson says the Earth is hollow" in your
> list
> of misquotes? ...you know, the ones that are going to see you done for
> defamation...

>>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
>>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

> inverse space. x = 1/X

> You've forgotten to mention his being a twice arrested "wife beater"
> as well as a drug induced "Satan worshiper", because that's exactly
> what their Zionist/Jewish policy includes and approves of, as well as
> slave ownership and apparently body snatchings for live organ
> harvesting, along with their kosher approved SEC and its Ponzi Madoff
> types that have no remorse about stealing from God, their own kind, or
> their putting dark-skinned folks on a stick, and more recently
> excessively irradiating 100,000 dark-skinned Jewish kids.

> ______________________________
> So Einstein harvested organs, owned slaves and worshipped Satan while on
> drugs?

>> Henry Wilson DSc wrote:

>>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
>>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
>>> star?

>>> It could easily be hollow.
>>   No Henry, Henri--the centrifugal force from the perspective
>>   of a rotating coordinate system goes to zero at the core.

> I know that.

> It could never become hollow if it was solid....but how do you know it was ever
> solid?

>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
>news:aoj1f596g3p7lhnf7q5prpffac1gqd8ds4@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:30:42 -0000, "Androcles"

>>>Nobody thinks the Earth is hollow, and he doesn't read my posts.
>>>Nobody is drunk, the only thing that is hollow is his cask of cheap
>>>red wine.

>> I suppose you will now include "Wilson says the Earth is hollow" in your
>> list
>> of misquotes? ...you know, the ones that are going to see you done for
>> defamation...

>The nobody Wilson reads my posts... any time you want to
>sue, go ahead, Google has the archives. Oh, and err... "suppose"
>all you want to, even in civil cases a modicum of proof is required.
>A preponderance of the evidence is good enough, only in criminal
>cases do you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
>Since I have proof absolute that you said
> "There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
>   http://tinyurl.com/2rk695
>you won't have a leg to stand on.

>>>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
>>>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

>> inverse space. x = 1/X

>Not the question I asked.

>>> Henry Wilson DSc wrote:

>>>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
>>>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
>>>> star?

>>>> It could easily be hollow.
>>>   No Henry, Henri--the centrifugal force from the perspective
>>>   of a rotating coordinate system goes to zero at the core.

>> I know that.

>> It could never become hollow if it was solid....but how do you know it was ever
>> solid?

>   It's a force called gravity--look it up!

> >> Henry Wilson DSc wrote:

> >>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
> >>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
> >>> star?

> >>> It could easily be hollow.
> >>   No Henry, Henri--the centrifugal force from the perspective
> >>   of a rotating coordinate system goes to zero at the core.

> > I know that.

> > It could never become hollow if it was solid....but how do you know it was ever
> > solid?

>    It's a force called gravity--look it up!

>>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
>>news:aoj1f596g3p7lhnf7q5prpffac1gqd8ds4@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:30:42 -0000, "Androcles"

>>>>Nobody thinks the Earth is hollow, and he doesn't read my posts.
>>>>Nobody is drunk, the only thing that is hollow is his cask of cheap
>>>>red wine.

>>> I suppose you will now include "Wilson says the Earth is hollow" in your
>>> list
>>> of misquotes? ...you know, the ones that are going to see you done for
>>> defamation...

>>The nobody Wilson reads my posts... any time you want to
>>sue, go ahead, Google has the archives. Oh, and err... "suppose"
>>all you want to, even in civil cases a modicum of proof is required.
>>A preponderance of the evidence is good enough, only in criminal
>>cases do you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
>>Since I have proof absolute that you said
>> "There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
>>   http://tinyurl.com/2rk695
>>you won't have a leg to stand on.

> We were talking about doppler shift at the source.
> there isn't any in BaTh.

> You'd better get a good lawyer.

>>>>> There is no gravity field inside homogeneous shell.

>>>>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
>>>>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

>>> inverse space. x = 1/X

>>Not the question I asked.

> No but its a good answer anyway.

>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
>news:lru1f5t6m6j2e4ho8hdecjtqrjqpeq5127@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:15:22 -0000, "Androcles"
>>>The nobody Wilson reads my posts... any time you want to
>>>sue, go ahead, Google has the archives. Oh, and err... "suppose"
>>>all you want to, even in civil cases a modicum of proof is required.
>>>A preponderance of the evidence is good enough, only in criminal
>>>cases do you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
>>>Since I have proof absolute that you said
>>> "There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
>>>   http://tinyurl.com/2rk695
>>>you won't have a leg to stand on.

>> We were talking about doppler shift at the source.
>> there isn't any in BaTh.

>> You'd better get a good lawyer.

>"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
>   http://tinyurl.com/2rk695

>>>>>> There is no gravity field inside homogeneous shell.

>>>>>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
>>>>>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

>>>> inverse space. x = 1/X

>>>Not the question I asked.

>> No but its a good answer anyway.

>Only for a drunk.

>>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
>>news:lru1f5t6m6j2e4ho8hdecjtqrjqpeq5127@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:15:22 -0000, "Androcles"

>>>>The nobody Wilson reads my posts... any time you want to
>>>>sue, go ahead, Google has the archives. Oh, and err... "suppose"
>>>>all you want to, even in civil cases a modicum of proof is required.
>>>>A preponderance of the evidence is good enough, only in criminal
>>>>cases do you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
>>>>Since I have proof absolute that you said
>>>> "There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
>>>>   http://tinyurl.com/2rk695
>>>>you won't have a leg to stand on.

>>> We were talking about doppler shift at the source.
>>> there isn't any in BaTh.

>>> You'd better get a good lawyer.

>>"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
>>   http://tinyurl.com/2rk695

>>>>>>> There is no gravity field inside homogeneous shell.

>>>>>>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
>>>>>>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

>>>>> inverse space. x = 1/X

>>>>Not the question I asked.

>>> No but its a good answer anyway.

>>Only for a drunk.

> It explains infinity. Space is inverse, It goes to zero when X =
> infinity..

> > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:35:45 -0000, "Androcles"
> > <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics_p>
> > wrote:

> >>"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
> >>news:lru1f5t6m6j2e4ho8hdecjtqrjqpeq5127@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:15:22 -0000, "Androcles"

> >>>>The nobody Wilson reads my posts... any time you want to
> >>>>sue, go ahead, Google has the archives. Oh, and err... "suppose"
> >>>>all you want to, even in civil cases a modicum of proof is required.
> >>>>A preponderance of the evidence is good enough, only in criminal
> >>>>cases do you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
> >>>>Since I have proof absolute that you said
> >>>> "There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
> >>>>  http://tinyurl.com/2rk695
> >>>>you won't have a leg to stand on.

> >>> We were talking about doppler shift at the source.
> >>> there isn't any in BaTh.

> >>> You'd better get a good lawyer.

> >>"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
> >>  http://tinyurl.com/2rk695

> >>>>>>> There is no gravity field inside homogeneous shell.

> >>>>>>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
> >>>>>>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

> >>>>> inverse space. x = 1/X

> >>>>Not the question I asked.

> >>> No but its a good answer anyway.

> >>Only for a drunk.

> > It explains infinity. Space is inverse, It goes to zero when X =
> > infinity..

> Only for an extreme drunk.
> We mathematicians say division by zero is undefined.
> a = b, given.
> a^2 = ab, multiplying both sides by a.
> a^2-b^2 = ab-b^2, subtracting b^2 from both sides.
> (a+b)(a-b) = b(a-b), factorising.
> a+b = b, dividing both sides by (a-b).
> b+b = b, because a = b, given.
> 2b = b, because b+b = 2b
> 2 = 1, dividing both sides by b.
> Since 2b = b, proven, it follows a = 2b
> and we can prove all numbers = 1, so all numbers are equal
> but some are more equal than others. No infinity involved.

> >"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
> >news:lru1f5t6m6j2e4ho8hdecjtqrjqpeq5127@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:15:22 -0000, "Androcles"
> >>>The nobody Wilson reads my posts... any time you want to
> >>>sue, go ahead, Google has the archives. Oh, and err... "suppose"
> >>>all you want to, even in civil cases a modicum of proof is required.
> >>>A preponderance of the evidence is good enough, only in criminal
> >>>cases do you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
> >>>Since I have proof absolute that you said
> >>> "There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
> >>>  http://tinyurl.com/2rk695
> >>>you won't have a leg to stand on.

> >> We were talking about doppler shift at the source.
> >> there isn't any in BaTh.

> >> You'd better get a good lawyer.

> >"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
> >  http://tinyurl.com/2rk695

> >>>>>> There is no gravity field inside homogeneous shell.

> >>>>>So the entire universe could be enclosed in such a shell and
> >>>>>we'd never know it. But what would be outside it?

> >>>> inverse space. x = 1/X

> >>>Not the question I asked.

> >> No but its a good answer anyway.

> >Only for a drunk.

> It explains infinity. Space is inverse, It goes to zero when X = infinity..

> Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

>        Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

>>Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
>>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:58:11 GMT, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:

>>>> Henry Wilson DSc wrote:

>>>>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
>>>>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
>>>>> star?

>>>>> It could easily be hollow.
>>>>   No Henry, Henri--the centrifugal force from the perspective
>>>>   of a rotating coordinate system goes to zero at the core.

>>> I know that.

>>> It could never become hollow if it was solid....but how do you know it was ever
>>> solid?

>>   It's a force called gravity--look it up!

>What are the required conditions for spinning matter to condense into a HOLLOW
>ball rather than a solid one?

> >On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:47:03 GMT, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:

> >>Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:58:11 GMT, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:

> >>>> Henry Wilson DSc wrote:

> >>>>> Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
> >>>>> gratvity near the centre.    But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
> >>>>> star?

> >>>>> It could easily be hollow.
> >>>>   No Henry, Henri--the centrifugal force from the perspective
> >>>>   of a rotating coordinate system goes to zero at the core.

> >>> I know that.

> >>> It could never become hollow if it was solid....but how do you know it was ever
> >>> solid?

> >>   It's a force called gravity--look it up!

> >What are the required conditions for spinning matter to condense into a HOLLOW
> >ball rather than a solid one?

> I can't imagine that it would ever do that.  The equator of the object can
> be spinning fast enough to resist gravity, but the north and south poles
> will be subject to gravity and collapse inwards.  A rapidly spinning object
> will deform into a disk (assuming it doesn't fly apart first), not an
> empty shell.

> Alan
> --
> Defendit numerus