> > Anyhow, I see these 13 to 14 year olds flocking to grandpa who is > > worshipped by Einstein Dingleberries for more than 100 years. When > > these kids find out that Einstein was nothing but a nitwit, a > > plagiarist, and a liar, see how many children would flock to that > > nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar. However, the only reason who > > jeff relf worships Eisntein is that Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a > > plagiarist, and a liar. Got anymore photos of Einstein the nitwit, > > the plagiarist, and the liar (be it wax or not) in companies of > > children?
> > <shrug>
> You forgot to mention "wife beater" and drug induced "Satan > worshiper", because that’s what their Zionist/Jewish policy includes > and approves of, as well as slave ownership and apparently body > snatchings for live organ harvesting, along with their kosher approved > SEC and its Ponzi Madoff types that have no remorse about steeling
Like, 'steeling" for "steal"? Does it really get that dumb? In a science newsgroup, no less? When you're too stupid to spell at that elementary level it ony tells ya the guy is too stupid to read anything above that level. Hence the kind of "thinking" he does.
I'll give him a "Zionist/Jewish policy". Let this hair-on-fire Ernst Rohm in his little Nazi boots go to Gaza and join up with Hamas. Then let the IDF give him the "Zionist/Jewish policy" right close up and personal. :-)
That depth is rather shallow. As for hollow, I'd say that below the crust/mantle zone you won't find any voids.
> Obviously the interior is not of a uniform density, nor is it getting > uniformly compressed,
That's a given since the mantle/crust is not uniform in composition. Nor does the crust have uniform weight distribution by itself, or with water/ice covering major portions of the crust. Add in hot spots and you get regions that have completely different characteristics to other regions. In fact, each volcanic area on the planet has a unique finger print to its area. A volcanologists can tell you what volcanic sample came from which volcano.
Slap on some ice ages to change the weight distribution, then remove that distribution, and things get a bit funny. The planet is still popping out the kinks from the last ice age. That's why you don't see a huge rise in sea levels when the ice melts, because the land rises and the oceans sink.
> The objectively deep Russian drilling at 12+ km doesn't agree with > your analogy. It's as though the inner layer of our crust (say from 6 > to 10 km depth) is extremely dense, though below that mark it gets > less dense (and they still do not know why).
7 miles is still rather shallow. That location was chosen because of the nature of the region. Regardless, to think that the crust, or mantle, is uniform is in error. One need only look at the different types of volcanoes and there lava flows to figure this out. What's under the crust may be considered "liquid", but it does not behave like a liquid in a pure sense. Things don't diffuse readily in a material that is like taffy.
> > > Anyhow, I see these 13 to 14 year olds flocking to grandpa who is > > > worshipped by Einstein Dingleberries for more than 100 years. When > > > these kids find out that Einstein was nothing but a nitwit, a > > > plagiarist, and a liar, see how many children would flock to that > > > nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar. However, the only reason who > > > jeff relf worships Eisntein is that Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a > > > plagiarist, and a liar. Got anymore photos of Einstein the nitwit, > > > the plagiarist, and the liar (be it wax or not) in companies of > > > children?
> > > <shrug>
> > You forgot to mention "wife beater" and drug induced "Satan > > worshiper", because that’s what their Zionist/Jewish policy includes > > and approves of, as well as slave ownership and apparently body > > snatchings for live organ harvesting, along with their kosher approved > > SEC and its Ponzi Madoff types that have no remorse about steeling
> Like, 'steeling" for "steal"? Does it really get that dumb? In a > science newsgroup, no less? When you're too stupid to spell at that > elementary level it ony tells ya the guy is too stupid to read > anything above that level. Hence the kind of "thinking" he does.
> I'll give him a "Zionist/Jewish policy". Let this hair-on-fire Ernst > Rohm in his little Nazi boots go to Gaza and join up with Hamas. Then > let the IDF give him the "Zionist/Jewish policy" right close up and > personal. :-)
> Anyhow, I see these 13 to 14 year olds flocking to grandpa who is > worshipped by Einstein Dingleberries for more than 100 years. When > these kids find out that Einstein was nothing but a nitwit, a > plagiarist, and a liar, see how many children would flock to that > nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar. However, the only reason who > jeff relf worships Eisntein is that Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a > plagiarist, and a liar. Got anymore photos of Einstein the nitwit, > the plagiarist, and the liar (be it wax or not) in companies of > children?
> <shrug>
You've forgotten to mention his being a twice arrested "wife beater" as well as a drug induced "Satan worshiper", because that’s exactly what their Zionist/Jewish policy includes and approves of, as well as slave ownership and apparently body snatchings for live organ harvesting, along with their kosher approved SEC and its Ponzi Madoff types that have no remorse about stealing from God, their own kind, or their putting dark-skinned folks on a stick, and more recently excessively irradiating 100,000 dark-skinned Jewish kids.
> > > Before you bother, your obfuscation is noted.
> > Obfuscation? We were talking about the Earth, not the moon.
> > Care to try again?
> Under the relatively thin crust of Earth, who knows what goes on?
> How much thorium, uranium, radium and so on is in there?
> How much of Earth's core is hydrogen and helium?
> According to Russian deep drilling, at 10+ km it's not of higher > density as they go deeper. What gives?
> ~ BG
How do we know for certain the chemical make up of the Earths interior? Taking into account that there is a large window for the gravitational constant.
You've forgotten to mention his being a twice arrested "wife beater" as well as a drug induced "Satan worshiper", because that’s exactly what their Zionist/Jewish policy includes and approves of, as well as slave ownership and apparently body snatchings for live organ harvesting, along with their kosher approved SEC and its Ponzi Madoff types that have no remorse about stealing from God, their own kind, or their putting dark-skinned folks on a stick, and more recently excessively irradiating 100,000 dark-skinned Jewish kids.
______________________________ So Einstein harvested organs, owned slaves and worshipped Satan while on drugs?
Are you sure Einstein didn't also eat Christian babies for dinner? I can see no authoritative source which rules this out, so its probably true. Jews love eating Christian babies.
> > > Before you bother, your obfuscation is noted.
> > Obfuscation? We were talking about the Earth, not the moon.
> > Care to try again?
> Under the relatively thin crust of Earth, who knows what goes on?
> How much thorium, uranium, radium and so on is in there?
> How much of Earth's core is hydrogen and helium?
> According to Russian deep drilling, at 10+ km it's not of higher > density as they go deeper. What gives?
> ~ BG
How do we know for certain the chemical make up of the Earths interior? Taking into account that there is a large window for the gravitational constant.
________________________________ There are several ways. We know the earth's average density. We know what happens to shock waves moving through the earth, for both compressional and shear waves, so we can reverse engineer this signals (much as what happens in CAT scanning) to determine the nature of the propogating material. We have geophysical evidence derived from movements of the earth's magnetic field. We also have a lot of physics which provides us with reasonably good estimates of pressure and temperature as a function of depth.
> hanson wrote: > > > Usenet accounts about Albert's vile and dark side go back a > > > decade, by n' large in response to poster Stephen Speicher, > > > a grossly fanatical & virulent Einstein Dingleberry who provoked > > > Christopher Jon Bjerknes to do research and write a book about > > > Einstein's kinky kikeism.
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > Thanks for the recent history.
> hanson wrote: > > > To most Jews Einstein's unsavory character is no surprise and > > > neither is the fact that Einstein's popularity was a promotional > > > product by the Zionists during the Weimar Republic years. > > > Albert did fit and was used by the Zio's agenda and they even > > > proposed to him to become and be the 1st PM of Israel... ahahaha...
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > Einstein was a nitwit. What do you expect to do when given such a > > responsibility?
> hanson wrote: > > > Einstein chickened out. He had too much baggage that would have > > > been vetted and vented ... ahaha... like the dirty little secret that > > > it > > > was NOT Albert Einstein himself, but his first Christian wife Mileva > > > Maric, who conceived, constructed/mathed & authored the 1905 > > > paper about Relativity.
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > Given Mileva being so much intelligent than Einstein the nitwit, the > > plagiarist, and the liar, the possibility of that Mileva being the > > original authors of Einstein’s 1905 papers is very high indeed.
> hanson wrote: > > > Allegedly she nagged him to publish her manuscript under his name > > > because in 1905 women belonged into the kitchen but not into the > > > intellectual realm of physics. He reluctantly and grudgingly did.. > > > But Albert did not include a single footnote, ref, citation nor any > > > acknowledgments... Freudian slippage or deliberately... ahahaha...
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > She should have fought her way out to publish that under her name just > > like Misner.
> hanson wrote: > > > There was, early in 2004, a full hour long TV documentary over this, > > > wherein many physics scholars spoke out about how Albert published > > > the intellectual SR property created by his non-Jewish wife, & then > > > how he dumped her when he became famous. > > > The kicker really is that after Einstein got his promotion into > > > "fame", > > > by the Zios, and he divorced Mileva, he signed over all the money > > > from his Nobel prize to her... as "hush money"... ahahaha... an event > > > which Einstein brushed away with his corny humor, him saying:
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > A tell-tale sign.
> hanson wrote: > > > "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources".
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > That phrase is all over the internet now. Mr. Stachel whose job > > depends on promoting a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar into godhood > > would naturally try to erase any references to that quote.
> hanson wrote: > > > That secret source was Mileva of course. So, to Einstein's credit it > > > must be said that he himself confessed and admitted to his scum > > > behavior and paid for it with Hush money to his Ex-wife when he > > > assigned all the monies he received from the (future) Nobel price to > > > his ex-wife Mileva.
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > Don’t forget that the Lorentz transform was logically inconsistent > > ever since day one when Larmor wrote it down. More than a decade > > earlier, Voigt tossed the Lorentz transform into the trashbin in favor > > of the Voigt transform.
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > I thought Mr. Kolker has much integrity than that. Attacking Mr. > > Bjerkness’s dick size and suggesting Mr. Bjerkness sleeping with his > > grandmother reflects how desperate Einstein Dinglberries are. Thanks > > for bringing up history into perspective.
> hanson wrote: > > > Like in all personality cults... and physics is no exception, the > > > Prophet's most fanatical and loud disciple come from outside his > > > own ilk. This is reflected in that the most vociferous and hysterical > > > comments in defense and in favor of Einstein do come from the > > > brainwashed Goyim, = non-Jews, aka Einstein Dingleberries, who > > > stammer in horror "You lie!!'.. against anybody who portrays their > > > hero in an unfavorable light... ahahaha... > > > Thanks for the laughs, guys, ....ahahahaha... ahahahahanson
> Koobee Wublee wrote: > > This is actually no laughing matter. The bottom line is that Einstein > > was a nitwit, plagiarist, and a liar. The stupid things that were > > credited to him were junk. That really reflects the intellectual > > might of the self-styled physicists. <shrug and sigh>
> > For example, they talk about black holes to make them feel important > > in their accomplishments, and yet upon scrutinizes of the subjects > > involved, we know that the mathematics that have created black holes > > was itself totally man-made in nature. On top of that, there are an > > infinite number of solutions to the field equations that are static, > > spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Among them, most of > > these solutions do not predict black holes. In doing so, the self- > > styled physicists have failed to justify why the Schwarzschild metric > > is more realistic than the Schwarzschild’s original metric. Without > > thinking, Professor Draper tried to bull$hit boundary conditions in > > selecting which metric is more realistic than the others but failed > > embarrassingly so.
> > Einstein Dingleberries seem to have no shame. <shrug>
> unkosher excrement Brad Guth cremented & wrote: > Contributor "hanson" is unfortunately worth something less than used > toilet paper, but then many Einstein lovers and haters give a great > deal of credit to such TP, as long as it's kosher TP to begin with. > Unfortunately, you can never tell which side "hanson" is on, even > though this time he/she/they seem to be on our side of sharing the > whole truth and nothing but the truth. > ~ BG
> hanson wrote: > ahahahaha... why & what about did you crank yourself, Brad?... > Your really sound like the unkosher stuff on used TP... ahaha... > But thanks for the laughs... ahahaha... AHAHAH...
> Koobee Wublee, I understand that you regard these historic > things as serious matters. To me however, having left academia, > ever since I freed myself from the slavery of post-docing, these > events have become very entertaining tid-bits worth reading in > the locus where one extrudes Guthballs and enjoys the feeling. > Remember, taking a good shit is worth half a fuck... > ahahahaha... Take care KW... hanson
> PS: > When and if fancy strikes I may wanna take up and discuss > with you some issues about the nature of Black holes. A > case can be made for their nature to be a very different > animal then the popular Schwartzschild solution (which > was propose IIRC century earlier by B. Pascal). Here are > my notions about it. You do the math on it (make a new thread): > <http://tinyurl.com/ykf356z> Barycenters Black Holes / Ghez.
Brad Guth wrote: >Your black holes of something other than horrific mass is
unfortunately what I've been arguing for nearly a decade. I happen to favor positrons/antimatter surrounded by those 1e100 photons/atom or conceivably per positron. However, the BHB (black hole barycenter) notion is one I hadn't thought much about.
The absolute vacuum of a stellar or galactic formed barycenter may not allow photons to pass through. Therefore it could be the absolute lack of mass that we perceive as a black hole. This too I'd argued some years ago, having suggested that it takes at least a few (say 1e3) atoms per km3 in order for photons to function, whereas below that threshold is where photons fail to migrate.
hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... So, you saw that decades ago. What happend?... ahaha Brad, I am NOT talking about any "horrific mass" anywhere... ahahaha... As usual you just lament about things that do not fit into any larger framework of physics. You just produce bullsherations like you constantly do. That is not physics at all. Take your silly "positrons/antimatter surrounded by those 1e100 photons/atom or conceivably per positron" is a typical example of your loud-mouthing phantasms... ahahahaha..
If you insist to take that route, then very first, tackle the problem where all this "positrons/antimatter" comes from, and explain the mechanism that sifts it out of the mix of matter/antimatter. Empirically, it is known that there is a ratio of, IIRC, 10^7 - 10^10 more matter then antimatter in nature. Intuitively and as per symmetry considerations (Emily Noether) that ratio should be ~ 1:1. So first show which of the currently known laws are broken, that make it possible to produce this lop-sided ratio. hanson
KW, I shall be back with you, on topic of the issue here, in a few days, after I stop laughing about Brad and a few other posters' notions. Take care KW. -- hanson
Perhaps my topics are making some of these folks think twice.
I'm interested in what makes a planet or its moon tick. Obviously the Sirius star system has something to do with various aspects of our environment, our Selene/moon, Venus and much more.
> > > > Before you bother, your obfuscation is noted.
> > > Obfuscation? We were talking about the Earth, not the moon.
> > > Care to try again?
> > Under the relatively thin crust of Earth, who knows what goes on?
> > How much thorium, uranium, radium and so on is in there?
> > How much of Earth's core is hydrogen and helium?
> > According to Russian deep drilling, at 10+ km it's not of higher > > density as they go deeper. What gives?
> > ~ BG
> How do we know for certain the chemical make up of the Earths > interior? > Taking into account that there is a large window for the gravitational > constant.
> ________________________________ > There are several ways. We know the earth's average density. We know what > happens to shock waves moving through the earth, for both compressional and > shear waves, so we can reverse engineer this signals (much as what happens > in CAT scanning) to determine the nature of the propogating material. We > have geophysical evidence derived from movements of the earth's magnetic > field. We also have a lot of physics which provides us with reasonably good > estimates of pressure and temperature as a function of depth.
> HTH
> Mitch Raemsch
Deeper drillings and/or small probes sent past the lower crust will begin to tell us how close our previous physics and science analogy has been.
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ad8939ab-0d50-4e6c-8290-7653b0660ccb@i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com... > I'm interested in what makes a planet or its moon tick. Obviously the > Sirius star system has something to do with various aspects of our > environment, our Selene/moon, Venus and much more.
On Oct 31, 9:05 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde...@dirtcheap.net> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:ad8939ab-0d50-4e6c-8290-7653b0660ccb@i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com... > > I'm interested in what makes a planet or its moon tick. Obviously the > > Sirius star system has something to do with various aspects of our > > environment, our Selene/moon, Venus and much more.
> I don't see how this leap in logic can be made.
It's perhaps called "Gravitomagnetism and the Newtonian Law of Gravity"
Are you suggesting that the "Newtonian Law of Gravity" is bogus?
Are you suggesting a nearby nova is nothing to take seriously?
Are you suggesting a relatively nearby 12.5e6 Ms molecular cloud is insignificant?
"empirically known ration?" yeah; depends upon how you define the word, that is more powerful than its anagram(s)!
> that sifts it out of the mix of matter/antimatter. Empirically, it is known > that there is a ratio of, IIRC, 10^7 - 10^10 more matter then antimatter
thus: you're implying that "Heawood's mistaken proof" was actually correct, iff you've proven the four-color theorem?
> It's always possible to give triangle numbers so that all vertices have a vertex number of 0. It's Heawood's equivalent formulation of the 4 color theorem ( Heawood's vertex character on the dual of a cubic map).
> But does there exist a proof or disproof for the following statement: > Given all the 2^(2v-4) combinations of triangle numbers, then any set of v-2 vertex numbers has all the 3^(v-2) different combinations of vertex numbers if the two missing vertices are adjacent?
thus: "empirically known ration?" yeah; depends upon how you define the word, that is more powerful than its anagram(s)!
> that sifts it out of the mix of matter/antimatter. Empirically, it is known > that there is a ratio of, IIRC, 10^7 - 10^10 more matter then antimatter
thus: you're implying that "Heawood's mistaken proof" was actually correct, iff you've proven the four-color theorem?
> It's always possible to give triangle numbers so that all vertices have a vertex number of 0. It's Heawood's equivalent formulation of the 4 color theorem ( Heawood's vertex character on the dual of a cubic map). > But does there exist a proof or disproof for the following statement: > Given all the 2^(2v-4) combinations of triangle numbers, then any set of v-2 vertex numbers has all the 3^(v-2) different combinations of vertex numbers if the two missing vertices are adjacent?
On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
> Pressure accrues. > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.
> What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ” > at the center of the earth ?
At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that the pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your brains to squirt out!
Double-A wrote: > On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote: >> Pressure accrues. >> The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.
>> What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ” >> at the center of the earth ?
> At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has > tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that the > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your > brains to squirt out!
On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:
> On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
> > Pressure accrues. > > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.
> > What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ” > > at the center of the earth ?
> At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has > tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that the > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your > brains to squirt out!
> Double-A
However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%) whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final sphere), how can there be pressure?
> At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has > tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that the > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your > brains to squirt out!
> On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double...@hush.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
> > > Pressure accrues. > > > The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.
> > > What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ” > > > at the center of the earth ?
> > At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has > > tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that the > > pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your > > brains to squirt out!
> > Double-A
> However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as > representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%) > whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even > reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final > sphere), how can there be pressure?
> ~ BG
If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would you care about gravity? Get the point?
|
