<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math.research Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research</link>
  <description>Discussion of current mathematical research. (Moderated)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Order of arithmetic and geometric means</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/426cc55e50172137/ca9dfab211375a38?show_docid=ca9dfab211375a38</link>
  <description>
  Consider a matrix of positive real numbers. Take the geometric means &lt;br&gt; of each of the columns, and then the arithmetic mean of the result, &lt;br&gt; and call this AG. Also take the arithmetic means of the rows of the &lt;br&gt; matrix, the geometric mean of these, and call it GA. I think I have a &lt;br&gt; proof that AG is always less than or equal to GA.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/426cc55e50172137</guid>
  <author>
  hob...@newpaltz.edu
  (David Hobby)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:00:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Continuous-time Markov chains</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/79d8356f4168288c/dfcb3b5b76913a92?show_docid=dfcb3b5b76913a92</link>
  <description>
  Often, continuous-time Markov chains with n_S states are defined by the &lt;br&gt; differential equation &lt;br&gt; d P(t) / d t = P(t) Q,	P(0)=I_{n}, Q \in R^{n x n} &lt;br&gt; where &lt;br&gt; q_{ij} &amp;gt;= 0 for i != j and q_{ii} = \sum_{i != j} (- q_{ij}). &lt;br&gt; The solution of this differential equation is the transition matrix &lt;br&gt; P(t) = exp( Q t )
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/79d8356f4168288c</guid>
  <author>
  johnsinete...@yahoo.de
  (Ivo Siekmann)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:00:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>True or False Logarithm</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/325ceb9ebda560ca/51895977b89b6de8?show_docid=51895977b89b6de8</link>
  <description>
  Let |b|&amp;lt;1 and consider the following polynomial sequence f_n(x): &lt;br&gt; f_n(x) = -sum from k=1 to n: binomial(n over k)*(-1)^k * (1-x^k)/(1-b^k) &lt;br&gt; I can show by elementary transformations that &lt;br&gt; lim_{n -&amp;gt; oo} f_n(b^m) = m for every integer m&amp;gt;=0 and &lt;br&gt; lim_{n -&amp;gt; oo} f_n(0) = -oo &lt;br&gt; Does this function sequence converge also for other points |x|&amp;lt;1 than
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/325ceb9ebda560ca</guid>
  <author>
  bo198214&#39;remove-quo...@googlemail.com
  (Henryk Trappmann)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:30:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>logarithm reciprocal limit</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/48ca096ec5f08a39/1fadfe71e32fb42a?show_docid=1fadfe71e32fb42a</link>
  <description>
  In my current research I encountered the following intriguing &lt;br&gt; sequence: &lt;br&gt; Define a_n recursively in the following way (for any b&amp;gt;0): &lt;br&gt; a_1 = 1 and for n&amp;gt;1: &lt;br&gt; a_n = 1/(1-b^n) * sum from m=1 to n-1 over a_m * (n over m) * (1-b)^(n- &lt;br&gt; m) * b^n &lt;br&gt; For ASCII handicapped people here the typeset formula: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://math.eretrandre.org/cgi-bin/mimetex.cgi?a_n%20=%20\&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;frac{1}{1-b^n}\sum_{m=1}^{n-1} %20a_m%20\left(n\\m\right)%20( 1-b)^{n-m}%20b^m
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/48ca096ec5f08a39</guid>
  <author>
  bo198...@googlemail.com
  (Henryk Trappmann)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:00:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Six papers published by Geometry &amp; Topology Publications</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4a8fe7615de03dcc/0ae57c39dce117b3?show_docid=0ae57c39dce117b3</link>
  <description>
  Four papers have been published by Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology &lt;br&gt; (1) Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology 10 (2010) 1437-1454 &lt;br&gt; Multiplicative properties of Morin maps &lt;br&gt; by Gabor Lippner and Andras Szucs &lt;br&gt; URL: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.msp.warwick.ac.uk/agt/2010/10-03/p050.xhtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; DOI: 10.2140/agt.2010.10.1437
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4a8fe7615de03dcc</guid>
  <author>
  g...@msp.warwick.ac.uk
  (Geometry and Topology)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:04:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>How to combine linear constraints on a matrix and its inverse?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/d8807acc71f3969e/d1b0813e24b68616?show_docid=d1b0813e24b68616</link>
  <description>
  Suppose there exists a (n x n) matrix A that is real and invertible &lt;br&gt; (nothing unusual or special about A). We do not know the entries of A. &lt;br&gt; However, we do have linear constraints, some of which are on the &lt;br&gt; entries of A and some of which are on the entries of its inverse &lt;br&gt; A^{-1}. All constraints are assumed to be consistent with the true
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/d8807acc71f3969e</guid>
  <author>
  frederick.tra...@gmail.com
  (Frederick Eberhardt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:05:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>System Identification methods</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/aadb6fef00b68ae6/b569af2a4f045916?show_docid=b569af2a4f045916</link>
  <description>
  I am looking for any papers that address the problem of solving y=Ax &lt;br&gt; for A where y and x are vectors. I assume many techniques have been &lt;br&gt; developed and would be really interested if a compilation of methods &lt;br&gt; has been published. &lt;br&gt; For any single y and x, there may be multiple solutions for A, but I &lt;br&gt; believe given a sufficient number of different y and x vectors, A can
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/aadb6fef00b68ae6</guid>
  <author>
  christopher.mad...@wiremetrics.com
  (Christopher)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:08:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Linked or not</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/1bd0d094a8207808/de8ca27baf2a93da?show_docid=de8ca27baf2a93da</link>
  <description>
  Circles in 3D can be either linked (topologically inseparable) or &lt;br&gt; separate. In 4D, what if anything defines whether two spheres are &lt;br&gt; similarly linked? Is this situation even defined? I know that in 4D &lt;br&gt; there are no knots, so maybe there are no links either. &lt;br&gt; Steve Gray
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/1bd0d094a8207808</guid>
  <author>
  stev...@roadrunner.com
  (S. B. Gray)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:03:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>GCD reduced lattices</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/7aeef934d9747025/563b7977bb89caa3?show_docid=563b7977bb89caa3</link>
  <description>
  Suppose we have an integer lattice. If there is a basis given by a &lt;br&gt; kxn integral matrix M with linearly independent rows, such that one of &lt;br&gt; the rows has a GCD greater than one, we may divide this out and and &lt;br&gt; obtain a sublattice. If this cannot be done, call the lattice GCD &lt;br&gt; reduced. Another way of defining GCD reduced would be that the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/7aeef934d9747025</guid>
  <author>
  genewardsm...@gmail.com
  (Gene Ward Smith)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:39:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Curvature via Koszul&#39;s formula?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/adab7dca3c22e712/70caf24784c197c0?show_docid=70caf24784c197c0</link>
  <description>
  I need a coordinate-free expression of Riemannian curvature involving &lt;br&gt; only vector fields and metric. I guess such a thing can be derived by &lt;br&gt; iterating Koszul&#39;s formula for the Levi-Civita connection - with quite &lt;br&gt; excruciating computations involving many dozens of terms. Has anybody &lt;br&gt; done (and published) this?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/adab7dca3c22e712</guid>
  <author>
  florifulgura...@googlemail.com
  (Martin Gisser)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:30:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Fractional operator</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/8ec4eb96973cf54e/3025f8c908a519cd?show_docid=3025f8c908a519cd</link>
  <description>
  Fractional integral and fractional derivative can be evaluated using a &lt;br&gt; unique operator. In my site &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://researchpages.my-host.org/home/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; can &lt;br&gt; be downloaded a pdf document that presents such operator; document &lt;br&gt; contains also a sketch of proof about the equality of this operator &lt;br&gt; respect traditional fractional operators.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/8ec4eb96973cf54e</guid>
  <author>
  ilario.maz...@gmail.com
  (ilario980)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:42:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Call for papers: WSOM 2011, 8th Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/3b080f50dfca51cc/247703cd06276bce?show_docid=247703cd06276bce</link>
  <description>
  ============================== ============================== ======= &lt;br&gt; First Call for Papers &lt;br&gt; for &lt;br&gt; WSOM 2011, 8th WORKSHOP ON SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS &lt;br&gt; 13 - 15 June 2011, Espoo, Finland &lt;br&gt; Aalto University School of Science and Technology and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/3b080f50dfca51cc</guid>
  <author>
  jaakko.pelto...@tkk.fi
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:18:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>MetaOptimize Q+A site</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/32d55b709d721603/62df98e8a46005ba?show_docid=62df98e8a46005ba</link>
  <description>
  Question: What is an accurate technique for computing the moving &lt;br&gt; variance? &lt;br&gt; Answer: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://metaoptimize.com/qa/questions/287/what-is-an-accurate-technique-for-implementing-moving-variance&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I have just launched a machine learning + statistics Q&amp;amp;A site: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://metaoptimize.com/qa/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I announced it initially to ML people, and am now announcing it more
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/32d55b709d721603</guid>
  <author>
  tur...@gmail.com
  (Joseph Turian)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:57:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>New website devoted to Differential Equations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/db1f3016ea1bbbf9/d66635361c85656f?show_docid=d66635361c85656f</link>
  <description>
  A Website Devoted to Differential Equations &lt;br&gt; A couple of months ago we posted a message here to announce &lt;br&gt; the availability of a new website, devoted to the subject of &lt;br&gt; Differential Equations, and whose goal will be to present &lt;br&gt; that subject in an as an intuitive and conceptual a way as &lt;br&gt; possible. The URL is:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/db1f3016ea1bbbf9</guid>
  <author>
  rspal...@gmail.com
  (Dick Palais &lt;palais@uci.edu&gt;)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Degree sequences of triangle-free graphs</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/b673546b32231658/97f71d306bcc80bd?show_docid=97f71d306bcc80bd</link>
  <description>
  What sequences can be realized as the degree sequence of a triangle- &lt;br&gt; free graph? Is there a characterization or a good algorithm?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/b673546b32231658</guid>
  <author>
  fred.gal...@gmail.com
  (Fred Galvin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:30:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
