<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math.research Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research</link>
  <description>Discussion of current mathematical research. (Moderated)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Request regarding counting algorithms in graph theory</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/0e2813bf1e23aa24/ba0b37e0967339bd?show_docid=ba0b37e0967339bd</link>
  <description>
  Does the algorithm involve actually generating the sets? &lt;br&gt; If so, the obvious thing to do is check each set of remaining &lt;br&gt; nodes to see if they induce a connected subgraph.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/0e2813bf1e23aa24/ba0b37e0967339bd?show_docid=ba0b37e0967339bd</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 3^n - 2^n and relatives</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/9339e819c72cc382/093c01b1ed29a3cb?show_docid=093c01b1ed29a3cb</link>
  <description>
  A couple of years ago I posted some discussion here which were &lt;br&gt; kindly considered by some posters here. It occured, that the &lt;br&gt; ideas, with which I connected my own 1-cycle-attempt in the &lt;br&gt; collatz-problem with the approximation of |S*log2 - N*log3| were &lt;br&gt; essentially the same as that of Ray Steiner (and later John
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/9339e819c72cc382/093c01b1ed29a3cb?show_docid=093c01b1ed29a3cb</guid>
  <author>
  he...@uni-kassel.de
  (Gottfried Helms)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Request regarding counting algorithms in graph theory</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/0e2813bf1e23aa24/e6ec0cf795d40a13?show_docid=e6ec0cf795d40a13</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hnqlgq$5b...@news.acm.uiuc.ed u&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; I misunderstood Knuth&#39;s example: it counts sets of edges which connect &lt;br&gt; the nodes of the graph. &lt;br&gt; But I think that an algorithm could be devised to count the partitions &lt;br&gt; of the nodes of the graph into two sets, each of which is connected by &lt;br&gt; arcs of the graph. I think the problems like this can be solved by means
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/0e2813bf1e23aa24/e6ec0cf795d40a13?show_docid=e6ec0cf795d40a13</guid>
  <author>
  chenr...@monmouth.com
  (Christopher Henrich)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Is there a not-easy-solvable PDE with probabilistic representation with known (or approximable) probability density?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/abff4349d0ff9af5/77a8dd4b4b05da2a?show_docid=77a8dd4b4b05da2a</link>
  <description>
  It is well-known that solution of many equations could be represented &lt;br&gt; as expectation of some functional of random processes (e.g. Feynman� &lt;br&gt; Kac formula and etc.) &lt;br&gt; So the solution is the expectation which could be calculated by Monte- &lt;br&gt; Carlo method. &lt;br&gt; But if the probabilistic solution is the expectation of the random
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/abff4349d0ff9af5/77a8dd4b4b05da2a?show_docid=77a8dd4b4b05da2a</guid>
  <author>
  andrewzak...@mail.ru
  (Andrew)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Request regarding counting algorithms in graph theory</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/0e2813bf1e23aa24/9aa165c4739cab7c?show_docid=9aa165c4739cab7c</link>
  <description>
  Donald Knuth, in _The Art of Computer Programming_ Section 7.1.4 [1], &lt;br&gt; describes an algorithm for counting the connected sets of nodes in a &lt;br&gt; non-directed graph: see Exercise 55. &lt;br&gt; I am interested in a related problem, namely to count the partitions of &lt;br&gt; such a graph into two connected components. Are there any published
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/0e2813bf1e23aa24/9aa165c4739cab7c?show_docid=9aa165c4739cab7c</guid>
  <author>
  chenr...@monmouth.com
  (Christopher Henrich)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:30:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Call for papers XA2010</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/60360d90c80fbf2d/b377321803ac828c?show_docid=b377321803ac828c</link>
  <description>
  XA2010 &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON &lt;br&gt; COMPUTER SCIENCES &amp;amp; APPLICATIONS&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; 3rd Edition &lt;br&gt; Timi ?oara, Rom?nia, September 24-25, 2010 &lt;br&gt; AIM &lt;br&gt; The 3rd European Conference on Computer Sciences and Applications &lt;br&gt; intends to stimulate the research activity and to establish &lt;br&gt; interactions between Romanian and foreign researchers, teachers, B.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/60360d90c80fbf2d/b377321803ac828c?show_docid=b377321803ac828c</guid>
  <author>
  afor...@gmail.com
  (afortis@gmail.com)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:40:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Nine papers published by Geometry &amp; Topology Publications</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/dbadcf5cd5da1f3b/ec6f90a712dd6791?show_docid=ec6f90a712dd6791</link>
  <description>
  Seven papers have been published by Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology &lt;br&gt; (1) Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology 10 (2010) 525-530 &lt;br&gt; Faithfulness of a functor of Quillen &lt;br&gt; by William G Dwyer, Andrei Radulescu-Banu and Sebastian Thomas &lt;br&gt; URL: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.msp.warwick.ac.uk/agt/2010/10-01/p015.xhtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; DOI: 10.2140/agt.2010.10.525
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/dbadcf5cd5da1f3b/ec6f90a712dd6791?show_docid=ec6f90a712dd6791</guid>
  <author>
  g...@msp.warwick.ac.uk
  (Geometry and Topology)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:24:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: decomposing rationals</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/17b494704c12939f/0230a0643323c6ae?show_docid=0230a0643323c6ae</link>
  <description>
  If a and b are rational, &lt;br&gt; this becomes an integer linear programming problem in two variables. &lt;br&gt; Such things are solvable in polynomial time. &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t remember details. &lt;br&gt; I think that you can solve the linear relaxation &lt;br&gt; and plug away with Gomory fractional cuts. &lt;br&gt; Selecting the approximations could be tricky.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/17b494704c12939f/0230a0643323c6ae?show_docid=0230a0643323c6ae</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:06:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/4c78c371b1e28497?show_docid=4c78c371b1e28497</link>
  <description>
  The above is roughly 1/n, but there are worse examples: &lt;br&gt; e_j for j in 1..k &lt;br&gt; k &lt;br&gt; SUM e_j + e_L for L in k+1..n &lt;br&gt; j=1 &lt;br&gt; k n &lt;br&gt; The vertices satisfy SUM x_j + (1-k) SUM x_j = 1 &lt;br&gt; j=1 j=k+1 &lt;br&gt; For k=2n/3, the distance to zero is roughly sqrt(27/(4n**3)).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/4c78c371b1e28497?show_docid=4c78c371b1e28497</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:13:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Call for Papers Reminder (extended): The World Congress on Engineering WCE 2010</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/c1648296576bdefb/d363a7c27d7b263f?show_docid=d363a7c27d7b263f</link>
  <description>
  CFP: The World Congress on Engineering WCE 2010 &lt;br&gt; WCE 2010: London, U.K., 30 June - 2 July, 2010 &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.iaeng.org/WCE2010&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Draft Paper Submission Deadline (extended): 18 March, 2010 &lt;br&gt; The WCE 2010 is organized by International Association of Engineers &lt;br&gt; (IAENG), a non-profit international association for the engineers and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/c1648296576bdefb/d363a7c27d7b263f?show_docid=d363a7c27d7b263f</guid>
  <author>
  imecs_2...@iaeng.org
  (IMECS 2008)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:42:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b0576937d621d2da?show_docid=b0576937d621d2da</link>
  <description>
  That is what I get, also. &lt;br&gt; The base satisfies the linear equation &lt;br&gt; n-1 &lt;br&gt; SUM x[j] + (2-n)*x[n] = 1 &lt;br&gt; j=1 &lt;br&gt; Lower bound, anyone?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b0576937d621d2da?show_docid=b0576937d621d2da</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:48:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b6160a9cf88414d8?show_docid=b6160a9cf88414d8</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure what this means, &lt;br&gt; but I think that it is not true even in three dimension. &lt;br&gt; that a minimal-height-defining line segment of a &lt;br&gt; tetrahedron lies within the tetrahedron. &lt;br&gt; Consider a tetrahedron with the following vertices: &lt;br&gt; (0, 0, 0), (3, 2, 0), (3, -2, 0) and (4, 0, 1). &lt;br&gt; Its minimal-height-defining segment is (4, 0, 1)_(4, 0, 0).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b6160a9cf88414d8?show_docid=b6160a9cf88414d8</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/fd94a62c6799b29a?show_docid=fd94a62c6799b29a</link>
  <description>
  Yes, but it seems I made a mistake there, as the height-defining &lt;br&gt; segment &lt;br&gt; does not always lie inside the simplex. &lt;br&gt; However, it does so, if the simplex has the property that all angles &lt;br&gt; between &lt;br&gt; edges are at most \pi/2. &lt;br&gt; Now for a simplex with vertices in {0,1}^n this condition is &lt;br&gt; satisfied! &lt;br&gt; By symmetry, it is enough to check this at the vertex zero.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/fd94a62c6799b29a?show_docid=fd94a62c6799b29a</guid>
  <author>
  corbenn...@googlemail.com
  (Corbennick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/dc33a76711be5765?show_docid=dc33a76711be5765</link>
  <description>
  no, is not. &lt;br&gt; For example, consider the simplex spanned by zero, e=e_1+...+e_n, e_1, &lt;br&gt; e_2,...,e_{n-1}, &lt;br&gt; where e_1,...,e_n is the standard basis. &lt;br&gt; A calculation shows that the vertex at zero has height equal to 1/ &lt;br&gt; sqrt(n-1+(n-2)^2) &lt;br&gt; which for n&amp;gt;3 is less that 1/sqrt(n).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/dc33a76711be5765?show_docid=dc33a76711be5765</guid>
  <author>
  anton.deit...@googlemail.com
  (Anton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Whitehead Groups of Short Exact Sequence</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/978e52094e25f637/4ca3566c94cfd55d?show_docid=4ca3566c94cfd55d</link>
  <description>
  Hello, all! &lt;br&gt; The Whitehead group of a group G, Wh(G), is a functor from the category &lt;br&gt; of (finitely presented?) groups to the category of Abelian groups. A &lt;br&gt; reference is _A Course in Simple Homotopy Theory_ by Cohen. &lt;br&gt; If I have a short exact sequence of finitely presented groups 1 -&amp;gt; K -&amp;gt; G &lt;br&gt; -&amp;gt; Q -&amp;gt; 1, and I take the Whitehead torsion of the sequence, forming Wh
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.gh/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/978e52094e25f637/4ca3566c94cfd55d?show_docid=4ca3566c94cfd55d</guid>
  <author>
  wildstar...@hotmail.com
  (Jeffrey Rolland)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
